Thus, top cards like the 8 GB Asus Strix RX Vega 56 have seen their price cut to a large extent.Īs we can see, it currently holds the historical minimum price, which is almost three times lower than the one it had at the time of its departure and 160 euros cheaper than just a few days ago. If we look at any Internet price comparator for the Amazon platform, we will realize how the market is after the staging of the last two NVIDIA cards. Drops of up to 160 euros in the RX Vega 56 and readjustment of the RX 590 To do this, they are applying a series of cuts in the price of their most popular cards to fully compete in this segment and, incidentally, empty the large stock that they still claim to have. Those of Lisa Su are clear about one thing, their asset is based on that premise and ratio, and therefore they do not want to give up the crown, at least, not without fighting it. The AMD Radeon RX 590 could drop its price to 200 euros in a few days Juan Diego de Usera Febru Until now, and after several years of dominating with an iron fist, AMD had this market well taken by the hand, but now it has found itself at a disadvantage and in a tough fight with those of Huang to maintain that status. NVIDIA has achieved something unthinkable as a brand in the eyes of users: positioning itself with several graphics cards within the ones with the best price/performance ratio. The NVIDIA GTX 16 Ti have moved the entire mid-segment market For this reason, AMD seems to have made a move, cutting the price of its main competing cards, including its RX Vega 56, RX 590 and RX 580, which are seeing how their stock is rapidly reduced according to the models for sale. The release of the NVIDIA GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti brings consequences for the market, and that is that the price/performance ratio that it has shown is difficult to match with current prices. The RX 580 and GTX 1060 have also been affected, but in a different way.Drops of up to 160 euros in the RX Vega 56 and readjustment of the RX 590.
The NVIDIA GTX 16 Ti have moved the entire mid-segment market.You can see the similarities and differences between the graphics cards in the table below. The number of their raster and shader cores or so-called CUDA cores is also the same – 384, and the difference between the two of them is mostly noticeable in the higher base and “boost” frequency of 940MX, as well as in GDDR5 version 940MX, which has GM107-B version with lower frequencies but with more CUDA cores – 512. They are 940MX and 940M, and you might encounter them mostly in budget notebooks that are used for multimedia or gaming.ĩ40MX and 940M have a lot in common starting with – they share the same core – GM108. The two NVIDIA graphic cards which we shall compare are part of the Maxwell generation and direct successors to the GeForce 840M.
0 kommentar(er)
